EYE CANDY
Don't (f)Stop Til You Get Enough
30 incredible long-exposure photos. It's Eye Candy on Viagra.
Comments
I like them, but I don't know if I'd call them incredible.
not sure how you take a long exposure of someone flicking a zippo...
you'd have to have it bolted down.. but why isnt there a blur where the thumb would be?
you'd have to have it bolted down.. but why isnt there a blur where the thumb would be?
JDH annan said:
not sure how you take a long exposure of someone flicking a zippo...
you'd have to have it bolted down.. but why isnt there a blur where the thumb would be?
not sure how you take a long exposure of someone flicking a zippo...
you'd have to have it bolted down.. but why isnt there a blur where the thumb would be?
i think that "picking out the metallic detail and the trails of sparking flint" meant it's shopped
Some were very nice, but the Vancouver one by comparison was fairly boring.
I don't get how they do ones like this without there being a blur from a person somewhere in the pic?
http://images.webdesignbooth.com/long-exposure-photos/light-writing.jpg
http://images.webdesignbooth.com/long-exposure-photos/light-writing.jpg
gspat spat said:
I don't get how they do ones like this without there being a blur from a person somewhere in the pic?
http://images.webdesignbooth.com/long-exposure-photos/light-writing.jpg
I don't get how they do ones like this without there being a blur from a person somewhere in the pic?
http://images.webdesignbooth.com/long-exposure-photos/light-writing.jpg
You don't capture as much or as intense light from a person passing through a frame as you do from a strong, steady light source. It is also related to how long of an exposure you have. The longer the exposure, the less you should be able to see of a person. Looking at it in terms of a digital camera, any given pixel may see a half a second of dim light reflected off of a person's body, but 8 seconds of light from a strong light source. I'm not 100% on this, but having messed around with long exposure night photography, I can tell you it is fairly difficult to capture a person moving quickly through an image.
/amateur photographer
/physicist
No boobies?
meh, most of those really weren't that "incredible".
And oh jesus god, I hate it when people try to intellectualize that have no idea what they're doing!
Plain English, dammit! Don't start throwin in them fancy words if ya don't know how to use em!
And oh jesus god, I hate it when people try to intellectualize that have no idea what they're doing!
Plain English, dammit! Don't start throwin in them fancy words if ya don't know how to use em!
softest voice said:
meh, most of those really weren't that "incredible".
And oh jesus god, I hate it when people try to intellectualize that have no idea what they're doing!
Plain English, dammit! Don't start throwin in them fancy words if ya don't know how to use em!
meh, most of those really weren't that "incredible".
And oh jesus god, I hate it when people try to intellectualize that have no idea what they're doing!
Plain English, dammit! Don't start throwin in them fancy words if ya don't know how to use em!
Peaceful Musilms: Please refutiate.
I like the way every apostrophe has become a letter o. Instant japanese!
I really like those pictures!
I don't really know how to describe it...but some of the pictures just give me this feeling... Awesome post.
I don't really know how to describe it...but some of the pictures just give me this feeling... Awesome post.
So is that long exposure of a clear moonlit night? That's crazy...
i wonder if some of these are dual exposure shots as much as long exposure......
Long-exposure is fun even with amateur point-and-shoot cameras
Done fireworks but not rides at the fair, going to try that this year
Done fireworks but not rides at the fair, going to try that this year
So is that long exposure of a clear moonlit night? That's crazy...
Yep. Near Kaikoura, NZ. Feet in the Pacific.
Long-exposure is fun for just screwing around too.
I shot this one with a crappy point-and-shoot.
It was pretty much totally unplanned,
but it turned out pretty sweet:
http://astoned.com/Images/samlasers.jpg
JDH annan said:
not sure how you take a long exposure of someone flicking a zippo...
you'd have to have it bolted down.. but why isnt there a blur where the thumb would be?
not sure how you take a long exposure of someone flicking a zippo...
you'd have to have it bolted down.. but why isnt there a blur where the thumb would be?
You know, I had the same question... maybe bolted down and pulled with a string wrapped around the drum? Still, it would move. I have doubts that this is purely a long-exposure work and not a Photoshop.
it is dark. Therefore the need for the long exposure. The sparks are bright so they expose in a flash. But the thumb and the turning wheel were exposed so little, that they don't show up at all compared to the possibly minute long rest of the exposure. Therefore, no recognizable blur.
Shutter speed priority mode - Yay!
Check it out, here's how I would do it:
Mount the lighter on something that will hold it still. Turn the lights off. Start the long exposure. Flick the lighter like normal, sparks go flying. Remove hand. Pop the flash. The end.
You get the exposure of the sparks plus a clean exposure on the lighter itself without any hand or movement.
Mount the lighter on something that will hold it still. Turn the lights off. Start the long exposure. Flick the lighter like normal, sparks go flying. Remove hand. Pop the flash. The end.
You get the exposure of the sparks plus a clean exposure on the lighter itself without any hand or movement.
I'll try to recreate it later, see if I'm right.
mediaphile said:
I'll try to recreate it later, see if I'm right.
I'll try to recreate it later, see if I'm right.
Oh, and this
http://images.webdesignbooth.com/long-exposure-photos/the-wizard.jpg
reminds me of a book cover or video game cover that I can't remember. Anyone have an idea?
http://images.webdesignbooth.com/long-exposure-photos/the-wizard.jpg
reminds me of a book cover or video game cover that I can't remember. Anyone have an idea?
mediaphile said:
Check it out, here's how I would do it:
Mount the lighter on something that will hold it still. Turn the lights off. Start the long exposure. Flick the lighter like normal, sparks go flying. Remove hand. Pop the flash. The end.
You get the exposure of the sparks plus a clean exposure on the lighter itself without any hand or movement.
Check it out, here's how I would do it:
Mount the lighter on something that will hold it still. Turn the lights off. Start the long exposure. Flick the lighter like normal, sparks go flying. Remove hand. Pop the flash. The end.
You get the exposure of the sparks plus a clean exposure on the lighter itself without any hand or movement.
My thoughts exactly
http://img830.imageshack.us/img830/3179/sparks001.jpg
My guess turned out to be correct. But! The trick was to wear black gloves. With my uncovered hand, the light emitted from the sparks was enough to get exposure on my fingers. Threw on a matte black glove, and it was all good.
My guess turned out to be correct. But! The trick was to wear black gloves. With my uncovered hand, the light emitted from the sparks was enough to get exposure on my fingers. Threw on a matte black glove, and it was all good.
And in mine, I flicked the lighter like three times in one exposure to get more sparks.
Cream Soda said:
reminds me of a book cover or video game cover that I can't remember. Anyone have an idea?
reminds me of a book cover or video game cover that I can't remember. Anyone have an idea?
Maybe the first Fable?
http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/en/5/5b/Fablebox.jpg
Mediaphile wins
haha thanks. I like this edit better: http://a.imageshack.us/img828/8085/sparks002.jpg
| home | login | new user |
