who the fuck can just out of the blue pull 17k out of pocket?
Why do we wait 10 years with no price hike and then suddenly spike the price through the roof in one year?
my guess is that your local govt is in charge took out shitloads of municipal bonds to pay for everything up until last year, and now the money isnt available to continue, or their bond rating has become a fucking disaster. Thats a very typical story these days.
Thats assuming your local government is in charge of water there. If it's a private company, then maybe its the same thing with normal bonds or something. In any case, I bet they put themselves into debt. Everyone was doing it. When the cool kid jumped off the bridge...
screwbacca said:
who the fuck can just out of the blue pull 17k out of pocket?
who the fuck can just out of the blue pull 17k out of pocket?
well, not everyone fell for the housing bubble
Caz1982 said:
my guess is that your local govt is in charge took out shitloads of municipal bonds to pay for everything up until last year, and now the money isnt available to continue, or their bond rating has become a fucking disaster. Thats a very typical story these days.
Thats assuming your local government is in charge of water there. If it's a private company, then maybe its the same thing with normal bonds or something. In any case, I bet they put themselves into debt. Everyone was doing it. When the cool kid jumped off the bridge...
my guess is that your local govt is in charge took out shitloads of municipal bonds to pay for everything up until last year, and now the money isnt available to continue, or their bond rating has become a fucking disaster. Thats a very typical story these days.
Thats assuming your local government is in charge of water there. If it's a private company, then maybe its the same thing with normal bonds or something. In any case, I bet they put themselves into debt. Everyone was doing it. When the cool kid jumped off the bridge...
Private, for-profit company.
sounds like theyre either bonded and desperate, or just assholes.
SwimFan said:
well, not everyone fell for the housing bubble
well, not everyone fell for the housing bubble
if it weren't for my horse i wouldn't have spent that year in college
is your horse amazing? does it taste like raisins?
screwbacca said:
if it weren't for my horse i wouldn't have spent that year in college
if it weren't for my horse i wouldn't have spent that year in college
Lewis Black. +5 for you sir!
Bloomberg.com said:
Stocks, Industrial Metals Drop as Yen Strengthens; Gold Gains
Nov. 3 (Bloomberg) -- Stocks fell from Sydney to London and industrial metals slid, while the yen and gold advanced as investors retreated from riskier assets after three of Europe’s biggest banks showed the industry is still far from recovery.
The MSCI World Index of 23 developed markets sank 0.9 percent at 10:19 a.m. in London and futures on the Standard & Poor’s 500 Index decreased 0.8 percent. The yen climbed against all but one of the 16 most-traded currencies tracked by Bloomberg. Copper dropped 2.4 percent in London, while gold futures rose to within 1.2 percent of a record.
UBS AG, Switzerland’s largest bank, posted a wider loss than analysts estimated, while Royal Bank of Scotland Group Plc and Lloyds Banking Group Plc received a second bailout from the U.K. taxpayer. Jon Greenlee, associate director of the Federal Reserve division that regulates banks, said yesterday that defaults on commercial real estate still threaten institutions.
“The basis for the correction seems to rest on three legs” said Bill O’Neill, a London-based strategist at Merrill Lynch Global Wealth Management, which has $1.1 trillion in assets. “Worries over prospects for holders of equity in banks; concern that interest-rate hikes are imminent; and paradoxically, that recovery in 2010 will be crippled by a U.S. consumer unwilling or unable to open his or her wallet.”
Financial shares led the retreat in Europe’s Dow Jones Stoxx 600 Index, which slumped 1.7 percent. UBS slid 4.4 percent in Zurich after posting its fourth consecutive quarterly loss.
Stocks, Industrial Metals Drop as Yen Strengthens; Gold Gains
Nov. 3 (Bloomberg) -- Stocks fell from Sydney to London and industrial metals slid, while the yen and gold advanced as investors retreated from riskier assets after three of Europe’s biggest banks showed the industry is still far from recovery.
The MSCI World Index of 23 developed markets sank 0.9 percent at 10:19 a.m. in London and futures on the Standard & Poor’s 500 Index decreased 0.8 percent. The yen climbed against all but one of the 16 most-traded currencies tracked by Bloomberg. Copper dropped 2.4 percent in London, while gold futures rose to within 1.2 percent of a record.
UBS AG, Switzerland’s largest bank, posted a wider loss than analysts estimated, while Royal Bank of Scotland Group Plc and Lloyds Banking Group Plc received a second bailout from the U.K. taxpayer. Jon Greenlee, associate director of the Federal Reserve division that regulates banks, said yesterday that defaults on commercial real estate still threaten institutions.
“The basis for the correction seems to rest on three legs” said Bill O’Neill, a London-based strategist at Merrill Lynch Global Wealth Management, which has $1.1 trillion in assets. “Worries over prospects for holders of equity in banks; concern that interest-rate hikes are imminent; and paradoxically, that recovery in 2010 will be crippled by a U.S. consumer unwilling or unable to open his or her wallet.”
Financial shares led the retreat in Europe’s Dow Jones Stoxx 600 Index, which slumped 1.7 percent. UBS slid 4.4 percent in Zurich after posting its fourth consecutive quarterly loss.
Europe’s biggest banks showed the industry is still far from recovery.
OMG NO WAI!
THEY TOLD US EVERYTHING WAS FINE WTF!!!!!
So let's say America wanted to get back into the manufacturing game in a big way, building products domestically for both our own use and for export
WTF would we make, if not cars?
It seems all the other manufacturing jobs went where the cheap labor is -- we don't have that, aside from what illegal immigrants can provide
Basically, are we effed? It seems we're too broke to spend and too expensive to pay. It doesn't look good, from this admittedly unlearned-about-finance perspective
WTF would we make, if not cars?
It seems all the other manufacturing jobs went where the cheap labor is -- we don't have that, aside from what illegal immigrants can provide
Basically, are we effed? It seems we're too broke to spend and too expensive to pay. It doesn't look good, from this admittedly unlearned-about-finance perspective
Keep in mind that manufacturing isn't just huge products.
Intel has it's biggest manufacturing plant in the US (I think), but other computer components could be made here.
Cell phones, kitchen appliances, power tools, regular tools, all sorts of things.
A lot of it IS still made here... the US is still easily one of the biggest manufacturers in the world even now after shipping half of it over seas.
Intel has it's biggest manufacturing plant in the US (I think), but other computer components could be made here.
Cell phones, kitchen appliances, power tools, regular tools, all sorts of things.
A lot of it IS still made here... the US is still easily one of the biggest manufacturers in the world even now after shipping half of it over seas.
http://resizeimage.org/system/0004/3566/exports.JPG?1257257752
This image only available for 2-3 days.
This image only available for 2-3 days.
And how long has it been since we were ahead of Germany? Ever?
And no, Japan won't be catching us any time soon, if ever.
And no, Japan won't be catching us any time soon, if ever.
America makes no real products JT... we just copy dollar bills on Xerox printers in huge offices.
Which reminds me, maybe I should buy some Xerox stock.
Which reminds me, maybe I should buy some Xerox stock.
US still leads the world in manufacturing by a bunch:
The world's top manufacturing country is the United States, as has been the case since before WWII. In 2007, the United States' manufacturing output was $1.831 trillion US Dollars (USD).... Important goods manufactured in the United States include, in order of percentage of exports in 2007: production machinery and equipment, 31.4%; industrial supplies, 27.5%; non-auto consumer goods, 12.7%; motor vehicles and parts, 10.5%; aircraft and parts, 7.6%; food, feed and beverages, and 7.3%; and other, 3.0%.
In 2007, the top manufacturing countries besides the United States were China ($1,106 billion USD), Japan ($926 billion USD), Germany ($670 billion USD), the Russian Federation ($362 billion USD), Italy ($345 billion USD), the United Kingdom ($342 billion USD), France ($296 billion USD), South Korea ($241 billion USD), Canada ($218 billion USD), Spain ($208 billion USD), and Brazil ($206 billion USD)
In 2007, the top manufacturing countries besides the United States were China ($1,106 billion USD), Japan ($926 billion USD), Germany ($670 billion USD), the Russian Federation ($362 billion USD), Italy ($345 billion USD), the United Kingdom ($342 billion USD), France ($296 billion USD), South Korea ($241 billion USD), Canada ($218 billion USD), Spain ($208 billion USD), and Brazil ($206 billion USD)
Elite1484 said:
OMG NO WAI!
THEY TOLD US EVERYTHING WAS FINE WTF!!!!!
OMG NO WAI!
THEY TOLD US EVERYTHING WAS FINE WTF!!!!!
please.
please, please stop this.
every time i see this, it fires some nerve right at the base of my skull and my teeth grit and my arms clench for just a second.
it doesn't last long, but it's really uncomfortable, and then the rage takes another 5-7 seconds to subside.
Nobody has said that we're out of the recession (except for some crazy lady on Democracy Now on some Houston npr station), and certainly nobody from the Obama administration is claiming that the recession is over or that the economy has recovered.
so.
stop.
fucking.
saying.
that.
the point is that things are improving, and honestly: if you think the economy is in the same frefall today that it was a year ago today, well, you're bad at math, and you have a really short memory.
This thing that you dumbshits do every week or so where you come in and post an article showing that, well, the economy is still in the shitter, and you say "wtf?! i thought the recession was over! hyuk hyuk hyuk!" is more baseless than when people ask where the quotes are from in the bash.org thread, and just as annoying.
Well yeah, Intel is actually cranking that shit out about 20 miles from where I'm at...and I'm using a Mac with Intel chips
Obviously there is still a manufacturing base here
Should it be bigger? Having heard a ton of this and that about manufacturing jobs going overseas, are we in any kind of position to get them back?
Do we want to?
Obviously there is still a manufacturing base here
Should it be bigger? Having heard a ton of this and that about manufacturing jobs going overseas, are we in any kind of position to get them back?
Do we want to?
Where are you guys getting these quotes from???
This thing that you dumbshits do every week or so where you come in and post an article showing that, well, the economy is still in the shitter, and you say "wtf?! i thought the recession was over! hyuk hyuk hyuk!" is more baseless than when people ask where the quotes are from in the bash.org thread, and just as annoying.
Jesus... does bFTE have two user names?
Things are improving, but my biggest gripe is the media and it's inability to make up its mind. One day it's doom and gloom and the next is unicorns and rainbows.
Government Helped CIT Limp Along Long Enough To Keep From Ruining Christmas
By Chris Walters, 7:57 PM on Mon Nov 2 2009
According to SpendMatters, one big reason the government burned through $2.3 billion in TARP funds for CIT even though it was buckling under debt was to try to avoid ruining everybody's Christmas this year.
That doesn't make the bankruptcy "good," since there could still be problems for stores. The Associated Press points out that this means retailers are going to have problems in early 2010 trying to get inventory, noting that "about 60 percent of the apparel industry depends on CIT for financing," and that retailers "still need a reliable source of lending to prevent shipping disruptions and to restock after the holidays." But it does mean that retailers were able to prepare for the shopping season without having to worry about how to get merchandise on the shelves.
By Chris Walters, 7:57 PM on Mon Nov 2 2009
According to SpendMatters, one big reason the government burned through $2.3 billion in TARP funds for CIT even though it was buckling under debt was to try to avoid ruining everybody's Christmas this year.
Jason Busch at SpendMatters writes,
...had CIT originally filed for bankruptcy earlier this year — around the
time the US government bailed them out — it could have had a disastrous effect
on the retail supply chain for the holiday season. But fortunately, the original
delay — which we can thank the Feds for — allowed "both buyers and
suppliers in the retail sector to get their shipments in and get paid,"
Kurt notes, in time for the holiday season.That doesn't make the bankruptcy "good," since there could still be problems for stores. The Associated Press points out that this means retailers are going to have problems in early 2010 trying to get inventory, noting that "about 60 percent of the apparel industry depends on CIT for financing," and that retailers "still need a reliable source of lending to prevent shipping disruptions and to restock after the holidays." But it does mean that retailers were able to prepare for the shopping season without having to worry about how to get merchandise on the shelves.
What Will CIT's Bankruptcy Mean for the Retail Supply Chain?
CIT isn't gone. They're restructuring their debt load. The only people really getting bent over here are the shareholders, who, unfortunately, were you and me.
I am still over leveraged in my personal finances. I'm working at correcting this and, if the math is right, I should be living on 60% of my income by April.
That said, just because you budget the rent doesn't mean it is paid. I've got to run over and write a check now. Sigh.
That said, just because you budget the rent doesn't mean it is paid. I've got to run over and write a check now. Sigh.
Pensions for top executives rose an average of 19% in 2008, with more than 200 executives seeing pensions increase more than 50%, according to a Wall Street Journal analysis.
http://online.wsj.com/article/SB125719963066023835.html?mod=WSJ_hps_LEFTWhatsNew s
I still can't figure out why our economy is fucked up.
Hey! They make the tough decision in figuring out who they will fire so that they can get their raises.
Let's see you deal with that responsibility!!
Let's see you deal with that responsibility!!
the manufacturing conversation and the executive pay conversation are related, IMO.
Yea, we still manufacture quite a bit, but less than we used to as a share of world product, we run a huge trade deficit, and more importantly the manufacturers, thanks to increases in efficiency, dont hire as many people. This creates problems in distribution of wealth.
Hypothetical situation: factory produces 100 units, pays 50 people a decent salary w benefits, and sees profits of 200 in a certain period.
Then, technology/production process advances changes it: 150 units per day produced, only 30 people paid, with greater competition for those jobs causing stagnation in wages and benefits, and profits go up to 300. This is strong economic performance. It's screws normal people, but people (labor) are economically just another input.
None of this is worrisome when theres still room for serious aggregate growth in the economy, but considering our consumer overload over the last couple of decades, I dont think thats the case anymore, at least domestically.
We really, really need to export if we want job creation.
Yea, we still manufacture quite a bit, but less than we used to as a share of world product, we run a huge trade deficit, and more importantly the manufacturers, thanks to increases in efficiency, dont hire as many people. This creates problems in distribution of wealth.
Hypothetical situation: factory produces 100 units, pays 50 people a decent salary w benefits, and sees profits of 200 in a certain period.
Then, technology/production process advances changes it: 150 units per day produced, only 30 people paid, with greater competition for those jobs causing stagnation in wages and benefits, and profits go up to 300. This is strong economic performance. It's screws normal people, but people (labor) are economically just another input.
None of this is worrisome when theres still room for serious aggregate growth in the economy, but considering our consumer overload over the last couple of decades, I dont think thats the case anymore, at least domestically.
We really, really need to export if we want job creation.
Inspector General Admits SEC Pretty Much Sucks At Its Job
By Meg Marco, 2:26 PM on Mon Nov 2 2009
The SEC's inspector general has released a jailhouse interview in which his royal Ponziness, Bernie Madoff himself, explains that he got away with his scheme because the SEC basically sucks.
From the NYT:
We are reminded of a Frontline episode about Madoff in which they cover how someone entirely unrelated to the SEC or Madoff figured out the Ponzi scheme and was ignored.
By Meg Marco, 2:26 PM on Mon Nov 2 2009
The SEC's inspector general has released a jailhouse interview in which his royal Ponziness, Bernie Madoff himself, explains that he got away with his scheme because the SEC basically sucks.
From the NYT:
In the interview, Mr. Madoff said that the young investigators who pestered
him over incidentals like e-mail messages should have just checked basics like
his account with Wall Street's central clearinghouse and his dealings with the
firms that were supposedly handling his trades.
"If you're looking at a Ponzi scheme, it's the first thing you
do," he said.
Those simple steps, he added, could have revealed years earlier that he was
running the largest Ponzi scheme ever, a crime that has now dragged the S.E.C.
into the worst scandal in its 75-year history. "It would have been easy for
them to see," he added.We are reminded of a Frontline episode about Madoff in which they cover how someone entirely unrelated to the SEC or Madoff figured out the Ponzi scheme and was ignored.
Bernie Madoff said:
lol the SEC is retarded.
lol the SEC is retarded.
How Goldman secretly bet on the U.S. housing crash
By Greg Gordon | McClatchy Newspapers
WASHINGTON — In 2006 and 2007, Goldman Sachs Group peddled more than $40 billion in securities backed by at least 200,000 risky home mortgages, but never told the buyers it was secretly betting that a sharp drop in U.S. housing prices would send the value of those securities plummeting.
Goldman's sales and its clandestine wagers, completed at the brink of the housing market meltdown, enabled the nation's premier investment bank to pass most of its potential losses to others before a flood of mortgage defaults staggered the U.S. and global economies.
Only later did investors discover that what Goldman had promoted as triple-A rated investments were closer to junk.
Now, pension funds, insurance companies, labor unions and foreign financial institutions that bought those dicey mortgage securities are facing large losses, and a five-month McClatchy investigation has found that Goldman's failure to disclose that it made secret, exotic bets on an imminent housing crash may have violated securities laws.
"The Securities and Exchange Commission should be very interested in any financial company that secretly decides a financial product is a loser and then goes out and actively markets that product or very similar products to unsuspecting customers without disclosing its true opinion," said Laurence Kotlikoff, a Boston University economics professor who's proposed a massive overhaul of the nation's banks. "This is fraud and should be prosecuted."
John Coffee, a Columbia University law professor who served on an advisory committee to the New York Stock Exchange, said that..........(MORE)
By Greg Gordon | McClatchy Newspapers
WASHINGTON — In 2006 and 2007, Goldman Sachs Group peddled more than $40 billion in securities backed by at least 200,000 risky home mortgages, but never told the buyers it was secretly betting that a sharp drop in U.S. housing prices would send the value of those securities plummeting.
Goldman's sales and its clandestine wagers, completed at the brink of the housing market meltdown, enabled the nation's premier investment bank to pass most of its potential losses to others before a flood of mortgage defaults staggered the U.S. and global economies.
Only later did investors discover that what Goldman had promoted as triple-A rated investments were closer to junk.
Now, pension funds, insurance companies, labor unions and foreign financial institutions that bought those dicey mortgage securities are facing large losses, and a five-month McClatchy investigation has found that Goldman's failure to disclose that it made secret, exotic bets on an imminent housing crash may have violated securities laws.
"The Securities and Exchange Commission should be very interested in any financial company that secretly decides a financial product is a loser and then goes out and actively markets that product or very similar products to unsuspecting customers without disclosing its true opinion," said Laurence Kotlikoff, a Boston University economics professor who's proposed a massive overhaul of the nation's banks. "This is fraud and should be prosecuted."
John Coffee, a Columbia University law professor who served on an advisory committee to the New York Stock Exchange, said that..........(MORE)
MarkeyWatch.com released a their new MarketWatch app for the iPhone it's pretty slick.
Only runs with 3G service.
JK Elite.
Only runs with 3G service.
JK Elite.
I hate you...
/tearface
/tearface
In 2006 and 2007, Goldman Sachs Group peddled more than $40 billion in securities backed by at least 200,000 risky home mortgages, but never told the buyers it was secretly betting that a sharp drop in U.S. housing prices would send the value of those securities plummeting.
Queue the Rolling Stone guy.
I wonder how the market is going to do tomorrow.
Might be a day to buy and flip some Dow Diamonds.
Might be a day to buy and flip some Dow Diamonds.
From: We B Gig OlO is the Unknown Stuntman that makes Eastwood Look So Fine
Date: 11/4/09 @ 10:35 AM
10,189
I would like to thank India for buying up a ton of Gold.
India said:
You're welcome.
You're welcome.
We really, really need to export if we want job creation.
Here's the part I have trouble understanding
If we have gotten to the point of manufacturing most of our daily goods overseas, paying the laborers peanuts, and buying them here with our big fat American money
How are we going to set up a system where we manufacture more things here, where you pay the laborers (comparatively) high wages, and sell them in places where people are being paid peanuts?
If we were so efficient at producing mass quantities of goods, the cost of that good could drop below said peanut levels.
More likely? Labor has to take a hefty pay cut.
More likely? Labor has to take a hefty pay cut.
We've been taking one for about 20 years now, at least
fenris said:
We've been taking one for about 20 years now, at least
We've been taking one for about 20 years now, at least
And it will keep going down until the price of producing a good here is on par with the cost of producing goods overseas (plus shipping, of course). Honestly, I've never had a theoretical problem with outsourcing. The problem I have with it is the application in real life. In theory, you outsource jobs until standard of living increases (over generations), and then the jobs come back when prices balance out. In real life, governments and other entities work to keep workers in a suppressed state, thus combating the "natural order" of the economic cycle. In the long term, you'd be looking at a global political-economic model that would encourage governments and businesses to lean on the poor and keep them that way for the profit of a few businessmen and the greed of the populace in industrialized nations. Actually, I think you could make a justified argument that it's already that way in many cases.
IMO, we should heavily punish businesses (by tax or tariff) that outsource to countries that are unwilling to adopt the same political-economic philosophies that form the rules and boundaries under which we operate. Of course, that only works for certain products. Full-spectrum adoption of that approach for necessities, particularly ones based on natural resources we can't access, would simply create artificial scarcity and drive prices through the roof.
But such is the quandary of a global economy, no?
Pretty solid assessment, yeah.
A fucking gold star if you can figure it out.
Me, I'm going to start growing tomatoes.
A fucking gold star if you can figure it out.
Me, I'm going to start growing tomatoes.
A five-month investigation by McClatchy Newspapers has revealed that Goldman Sachs made secret bets against the housing market while simultaneously selling off billions in soon-to-be worthless securities. In 2006 and 2007, the bank reportedly peddled more than $40 billion in securities backed by at least 200,000 risky home mortgages, but never told the buyers it was secretly betting that a sharp drop in US housing prices would send the value of those securities plummeting. We speak to McClatchy reporter Greg Gordon.
Goldman Slacks is the best American Company in history!
And it will keep going down until the price of producing a good here is on par with the cost of producing goods overseas (plus shipping, of course).
I don't think the voting American public is going to go along with this.
Of course we don't have to tell them.
An ABC News investigation has exposed how one of the country’s largest blueberry growers uses child labor on its fields. Adkin Blue Ribbon Packing Company in South Haven, Michigan is at the center of this scandal.
The Reagan Revolution, rolling the economy back to 1910 for 30 yrs.
Goldman Sachs had bets against CIT as well...
Guess who is going to make a shit ton of money off CIT's bankruptcy.
If anyone wants to be angry at anyone in this whole scheme of things, Goldman is a good place to start.
Guess who is going to make a shit ton of money off CIT's bankruptcy.
If anyone wants to be angry at anyone in this whole scheme of things, Goldman is a good place to start.
Not that I'm a Goldman fan...
But companies do bet against their own investments all the time. They even teach you to do it in personal finance so that you don't take a wallop when an industry or sector collapses.
Countertrend investing isn't wrong by itself. It's why you do it is that gets you in trouble.
But companies do bet against their own investments all the time. They even teach you to do it in personal finance so that you don't take a wallop when an industry or sector collapses.
Countertrend investing isn't wrong by itself. It's why you do it is that gets you in trouble.
From: Elite1484 has no problem chowing down some friend mushrooms
Date: 11/4/09 @ 2:53 PM
(more) 10,200
Not that I have any problem with it, but why is the market plunging now that we have the results of the Fed meeting today...
Did they announce something that was a surprise that I'm missing?
Did they announce something that was a surprise that I'm missing?
| forum | login | new user | top |

